konyaalti escort antalya escort lara escort
News

Common phrases that destroy your chances in job interviews

A language expert has warned job seekers about everyday phrases that make candidates sound less intelligent during interviews and harm their employment prospects.

Maxim Serebryakov, CEO of Sanas, said specific verbal habits can significantly reduce a candidate’s chances of getting hired even when their qualifications match the job requirements.

“Job interviews are high-pressure situations where every word counts and certain phrases can trigger negative reactions from hiring managers without candidates realising it,” he said.

The accent AI specialist noted that filler words like “um,” “like,” and “you know” top the list of expressions that damage interview performance and create impressions of uncertainty.

“These verbal tics might seem harmless but they signal a lack of preparation to recruiters who spend their days listening to candidates,” Serebryakov explained. “The unfortunate reality is that hiring decisions often get made in the first few minutes of conversation based on how you express yourself rather than what you say.”

Overused corporate jargon ranked second among the verbal habits that harm interview prospects, according to the expert.

“Phrases like ‘thinking outside the box’ or ‘giving 110%’ sound empty to experienced hiring managers who hear them multiple times daily,” he said. “They suggest the candidate lacks original thought or is hiding behind familiar expressions instead of speaking authentically.”

Serebryakov warned that constantly apologising creates another negative impression during interviews.

“Starting answers with ‘sorry’ or apologising before sharing an opinion makes candidates appear insecure,” he said.

The language specialist also cautioned against speaking too quickly, which happens when nervous candidates rush through answers.

“Fast talking prevents interviewers from properly processing what you’re saying and gives the impression you’re anxious or trying to hide something,” Serebryakov noted.

The fifth damaging verbal pattern identified was excessive self-criticism, with phrases like “I’m not an expert but…” or “This might sound stupid…” creating instant credibility problems.

Recent labour market statistics show UK employment competition remains intense with a 35.6% response rate for initial job applications in Quarter 1 of 2025.

Serebryakov recommended job seekers record themselves answering practice questions to identify problematic speech patterns.

“Most people have no idea they use these phrases until they hear themselves speak,” he said. “Simple recording exercises can identify speech habits that might be sabotaging your interviews.”

The expert suggested replacing weak language with specific examples and accomplishments.

“Instead of saying ‘I’m a team player’ which sounds generic, try describing a specific situation where you collaborated effectively,” he advised. “Facts and numbers create much stronger impressions than vague statements about your abilities.”

Serebryakov also stressed the importance of pausing during interviews rather than filling the silence with unnecessary words.

“Taking a moment to collect your thoughts shows confidence and consideration,” he said. “Most interviewers prefer a thoughtful pause followed by a clear answer over a rushed response filled with verbal clutter.”

With job application processes becoming increasingly competitive, the expert urged candidates to focus as much on how they communicate as what qualifications they possess.

“The candidates who succeed in today’s job market combine strong credentials with excellent communication skills,” Serebryakov said. “Small adjustments to speech patterns can dramatically improve interview performance.”

Tags: